In the next step we will check the 3D garden planner of gardena. The garden planner can be used without the need to download a software. The user need only the actual version of the Adobe Flash Player.
However, there are a system-engineering error. The garden planner of gardena is therefore useless. Similar considerations apply to the virtual garden of BBC. A lot of another garden planners like the garden planner of Smart Gardener require a registration.
After a long search we find a 3D gardenhouse planner free-of-charge and without technically errors of the firm “Gartenhaus nach Mass”. The user can by the gardenhouse planner step-by-step create their desire gardenhouse. He can choice between different objects liks doors or canopes.
After the completion of the configuration the user can see the exactly price of their desire gardenhouse. Compared to the first checked garden planner the user can save the created configuration.
The graphically implementation of the gardenhouse planner is terrible. It is very difficult to identify anything. The construction of the planner is very simple and provides only less options to choice.
Positive is the opportunity to save the configuration or view the price after completion.
The evaluation of the actually 3D garden planners cannot be positively at the moment. A lot of garden planners have technically problems or have the need to download software.
The garden planners without any technically problems are very simple constructed and provides at the moment only a rough orientation in planning of the garden in future.
To the theorem of Jean-Baptiste Say influence the offer the demand positively. Is that also true for 3D garden planners?